Skip to content

Dr. Stacy Cacciatore

Strategist | Storyteller | Scholar

Menu
  • Hi, I’m Stacy
    • My research approach
      • Running Rhetorics
  • Stacy Cacciatore’s Websites
    • One Mother Runner
    • Run Disney Mom
    • Mile Marker Matriarch
    • Mile Marker Matriarch Podcast
  • Stacy Cacciatore’s Books
    • Candy Around the World
    • Guilt-Free Cupcakes: Indulge without the bulge
    • Lunch, by me!
    • Culinary Duct Tape: Greek Yogurt: Just as versatile, not as tacky
  • Ph.D Digital Portfolio
    • Analyzing Rhetoric in Books and Film
    • Videos
    • Book Reviews
      • Book Review – Tasteful Domesticity by Sarah Walden
    • Food Rhetoric
    • Exam Defense
      • Every ‘Body’ Can Run: A Phenomenology of Women’s Recreational Running: Stacy Cacciatore’s Exam Defense
        • Exam Defense Speech
        • Every ‘Body’ Can Run Dissertation Trailer
        • Feminist Perspectives of the Body
        • Studying for Exams
          • Phenomenology
          • Barr, Liz. “Feminism, Epistemic Authority, and Biomedical Activism
          • Jack, Jordynn. “How Good Brain Science Gets That Way: Reclaiming the Scientific Study of Sexed and Gendered Brains
          • Sonia, Kruks. “Simone De Beauvoir: Engaging Discrepant Materialisms.” New Materialisms : Ontology, Agency, and Politics
          • Alaimo, Stacy, and Susan Hekman. Material Feminisms. Indiana University Press, 2008.
          • The Five Canons of Rhetoric
          • Buchanan, Lindal. Regendering Delivery: The Fifth Canon and Antebellum Women Rhetors.
          • Mountford, Roxanne. The Gendered Pulpit
          • New Materialisms – Coole and Frost Recap
          • Bodies matter
          • Phenomenology of the body as a lived experience
          • Mind-body dualism
          • The female body as a site of control
          • Intersectionality: Race and disability topics
          • Fat studies
          • Future research interests
          • Works Cited
          • Essays
          • Philosophy
          • Blackout Poetry
          • Burke
          • Film Rhetoric
      • Masters Degree
        • Digital Portfolio
  • Resume
  • Insider Threat Communications Case Study
  • Running Rhetorics: A Theoretical Framework
Menu

My research approach

August 20, 2025

My research approach is inspired by David Blakesley’s interdisciplinary method, Greg Ulmer’s MyStory composition mapping,  (for a detailed review of Ulmer’s MyStory technique, visit the Book Oblivion Reading Group led by a fellow Clemson cohort- Jessica Schad Manuel) and Cynthia Hayne’s, “the foremother of digital rhetorics,” rhetorical marriage of digital media and poetics.

Drawing from feminist rhetorical theorists like Jessica Enoch and Carol Mattingly, I examine how gender is expressed and contested through public embodiment—such as the choice to wear tutus or other performative gear during races. Michelle Smith’s approach of studying the rhetorics of gendered labor, particularly her historiographical research method for understanding the lived experience of gender across time, space, and place. Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity shapes my understanding of how running becomes a site of both conformity and subversion. Inspired by Sarah Hallenbeck’s work on the role of women’s rhetorical agency in the transformation of a male-dominated sport, I frame running itself as a rhetorical and material act—an embodied challenge hegemonic normative standards.

My scholarship also engages Doreen Massey’s theory of gendered space and Ufuk Ersoy’s narrative framework to theorize narrative architecture—the way movement through time and place constructs story, identity, and meaning. I use this to explore how women experience race courses, city streets, and natural terrains as gendered and storied spaces. I am incredibly proud of my work on the Narrative Architecture of the Chicago Marathon.

Central to my approach is Kimberlé Crenshaw’s theory of intersectionality, which guides my analysis of how gender, race, class, and sexuality shape access, experience, and representation within running culture.

I build on Cheryl Cooky’s work on gendered media representations of sport and critique of the erasure of women’s voices in both athletic and academic narratives. My research is further informed by Hoermann-Elliott’s study of embodied cognition and Haruki Murakami’s fusion of running and memoir, as I investigate how running becomes a mind-body practice for healing, identity formation, and personal liberation.

A core tenant of my research is based in embodiment and how running serves as a rhetorical device to help us make sense of, and process, trauma in the body. I expand Bessel van der Kolk’s seminal work on how trauma reshapes both the mind and body. I am particularly interested in the neuroscience of running and how running changes our brains through neurotransmitter systems.

Expanding upon Corporeal Feminism, examined by scholars such as Elizabeth Gross in Volatile Bodies, I draw connections between the running body and historical inequality in women’s sports primarily attributed to the notion that women’s bodies serve primarily a site of biological reproduction.

I center the lived experiences of trans and cis women runners, foregrounding running as a feminist rhetorical strategy—one that affirms agency, embodiment, and resistance through motion. This work creates space for voices often silenced in both sport and scholarship, building a radically inclusive framework where all women can be seen, heard, and empowered through movement.

No other scholar combines this depth of theoretical insight with personal, lived expertise. I don’t just study this—I live it. And I teach others how to run toward liberation.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 Dr. Stacy Cacciatore | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme