Skip to content

Dr. Stacy Cacciatore

Strategist | Storyteller | Scholar

Menu
  • Hi, I’m Stacy
    • My research approach
      • Running Rhetorics
  • Stacy Cacciatore’s Websites
    • One Mother Runner
    • Run Disney Mom
    • Mile Marker Matriarch
    • Mile Marker Matriarch Podcast
  • Stacy Cacciatore’s Books
    • Candy Around the World
    • Guilt-Free Cupcakes: Indulge without the bulge
    • Lunch, by me!
    • Culinary Duct Tape: Greek Yogurt: Just as versatile, not as tacky
  • Ph.D Digital Portfolio
    • Analyzing Rhetoric in Books and Film
    • Videos
    • Book Reviews
      • Book Review – Tasteful Domesticity by Sarah Walden
    • Food Rhetoric
    • Exam Defense
      • Every ‘Body’ Can Run: A Phenomenology of Women’s Recreational Running: Stacy Cacciatore’s Exam Defense
        • Exam Defense Speech
        • Every ‘Body’ Can Run Dissertation Trailer
        • Feminist Perspectives of the Body
        • Studying for Exams
          • Phenomenology
          • Barr, Liz. “Feminism, Epistemic Authority, and Biomedical Activism
          • Jack, Jordynn. “How Good Brain Science Gets That Way: Reclaiming the Scientific Study of Sexed and Gendered Brains
          • Sonia, Kruks. “Simone De Beauvoir: Engaging Discrepant Materialisms.” New Materialisms : Ontology, Agency, and Politics
          • Alaimo, Stacy, and Susan Hekman. Material Feminisms. Indiana University Press, 2008.
          • The Five Canons of Rhetoric
          • Buchanan, Lindal. Regendering Delivery: The Fifth Canon and Antebellum Women Rhetors.
          • Mountford, Roxanne. The Gendered Pulpit
          • New Materialisms – Coole and Frost Recap
          • Bodies matter
          • Phenomenology of the body as a lived experience
          • Mind-body dualism
          • The female body as a site of control
          • Intersectionality: Race and disability topics
          • Fat studies
          • Future research interests
          • Works Cited
          • Essays
          • Philosophy
          • Blackout Poetry
          • Burke
          • Film Rhetoric
      • Masters Degree
        • Digital Portfolio
  • Resume
  • Insider Threat Communications Case Study
  • Running Rhetorics: A Theoretical Framework
Menu

Notes – The homoerotics of the Phaedrus

April 23, 2019

The homoerotics of the Phaedrus

Page duBois

 

  • “Plato’s Phaedrus, as a text of high seduction, aimed at drawing the reader toward erotic life and therefore toward philosophy, plays with the edges of the Greek definitions of male and female to liberate the reader to a paradoxical sense of the fluidity of boundaries,” (p 9)
  • Calls Plato’s work logocentric
  • Derrida sees Plato in his emphasis on truth, presence and speaking, as aware of yet caught in the same contradiction as all thinkers who follow him.
  • “He insists on truth of the living voice, yet writes, insists on the living presence of Socrates, yet writes only after Socrates’ death.” (p 9)
  • “Furthermore and wrongly, I think, Derrida describes what he sees as an exclusively masculine lineage of philosophy, a phallocentric model of philosophical discourse, where the inheritance of dialectic passes patrilineally, from father to son” (9)
  • Female in Phaedrus as another pharmakon, a supplemental whom Plato delicately controls and appropriates in order to center on the male and thus a homoerotic model for philosophy
  • Plato’s text plays erotically with boundaries, with edges of space
  • “Plato uses the tension between the sexes in Greek culture, perhaps to assert the authority of the male at the scene of philosophy, but that his own desire to reconcile male and female makes that resolution a very provisional one,” (p 10).
  • The Phaedrus is a text of seduction
  • Socrates – two discourses – designed to seduce his companion Phaedrus
  • Logical method Socrates advocates – polymorphously erotic dimension
  • Logical-
  • Possibility of connection between reader-writer
  • Erotic play Phaedrus – relations between men
  • Excludes women
  • ThePhaedrus (/ˈfiːdrəs/; Ancient Greek: Φαῖδρος,  ‘Phaidros’), written by Plato, is a dialogue between Plato’s protagonist, Socrates, and Phaedrus, an interlocutor in several dialogues. The Phaedrus was presumably composed around 370 BC, about the same time as Plato’s Republic and Symposium.[1] Although ostensibly about the topic of love, the discussion in the dialogue revolves around the art of rhetoric and how it should be practiced, and dwells on subjects as diverse as metempsychosis (the Greek tradition of reincarnation) and erotic love.
  • Misogyny in Plato – consistent with his class
  • According to Timaeus, women are only created after the first generation of men “prove themselves cowardly and “unjust” and are “born again” as women
  • Male as A female as not A
  • Attempt to establish boundaries

opposite, to enantion (262b) is put into question as

suspect in the dialogue. But Plato’s text provisionally unites man and man,

and man and woman, in an erotic gesture which teases the reader, which uses

the repressed impulses of Greek male sexual identity, the desire to be the

  • female,apparently in order to cleanse the masculine soul of such impulses.
  • Socrates plays with erection and growth of wings, “and as the nourishment, streams upon

he, the quills of the feathers swell and begin to grow from the roots over all the form of the soul” (251 a-b).

  • Androgyny
  • Mother’s milk – ejaculatory stream – causes buds to sprout
  • Image of the chariot – Parmedies
  • Greek culture – repressive to women –
  • Socrates – in line of poets from Homer –
  • “Socrates’ delicate, literate gesture towards transvestism – belongs to a pattern of the Greek male’s fascination with and imitation of the socially suppressed female other,” (13)
  • “The mimesis of the female in the Phaedrus is perhaps a way of implicitly suggesting again the theme of intercourse between Socrates and Phaedrus by establishing a difference between them, one displaced from the erastes/eromenos difference, since both presumably are erasti” (13)
  • Erastes (Ancient Greece), an adult male in a relationship with an adolescent boy, also known as the philetor
  • Eromenos – (historical) An adolescent boy in Ancient Greece who was courted by an older man, or was in an erotic relationship with him.
  • Erasti – lover
  • Garden metaphors
  • Imagery Demeter, goddess of grain, of cereals, of fruitful human increase
  • Women’s sexual organs to be plowed by her husband, a metaphor, a metaphor from Oedipus Rex. The imagery of fruitful field characteristically used only of women, crosses the sexes once again (14)
  • Contains sperma, seed
  • Philosopher erotically implants his seed, his words, in the soul of the beloved,
  • Plato seductively uses the boundary between male and female, between homoerotic relationship among men and heterosexual intercourse. (p14)
  • Imagery – homosexual and heterosexual is an aphrodisiac motion
  • “Plato uses Socrates as a lure for the reader, who will conceive a desire for the older philosopher at his loveliest, carried off to the heavens in his vision of the good.”
  • “Plato is the pander for philosophy, making all readers Socrates’ erastai” (p 14)
  • The Greek titleErastai is the plural form of the term erastēs, which refers to the older partner in a pederastic relationship.
  • Plato plays with mimesis, distance, motherhood and the hypocrisy of absence.
  • He uses pharmakon and pharmakos

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 Dr. Stacy Cacciatore | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme